A discussion on legal and ethical implications of the debate

Adopted July 1,effective January 1, Comment [1] Reasonable communication between the lawyer and the client is necessary for the client effectively to participate in the representation.

A discussion on legal and ethical implications of the debate

What do you know, and who will you tell? The confidential relationship between mental health professionals and their clients has long stood as a cornerstone of the helping relationship. Effective psychotherapy…depends upon an atmosphere of confidence and trust in which the patient is willing to make a frank and complete disclosure of facts, emotions, memories, and fears.

Because of the sensitive nature of the problems for which individuals consult psychotherapists, disclosure of confidential communications made during counseling sessions may cause embarrassment or disgrace. For this reason, the mere possibility of disclosure may impede development of the confidential relationship necessary for successful treatment.

Jaffe v Redmond, The changing nature of societal demands and information technologies have led many to express concerns about the traditional meaning of confidentiality in mental health practice and even whether true privacy exists any more. Material in this online course has been adapted from Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions: Standards and Cases 4th Editionpublished by Oxford University Press, and additional new material has been added.

Moral and Ethical Issues in Gene Therapy | Society, Religion and Technology Project

Koocher and Patricia Keith-Spiegel, all rights reserved. Please note that all case material has been drawn from public records or the experience of the authors. Public cases are documented with media or legal citations.

Other cases use intentionally humorous names and disguised details to protect the privacy of those involved. Thomas Eagleton, a United States Senator from Missouri, was dropped as George McGovern's vice presidential running mate in when it was disclosed that he had previously been hospitalized for the treatment of depression Post, Disclosures of confidential information received by therapists also played prominently in the press during the well-publicized murder trials of the Menendez brothers Scott, and O.

Jerome Oziel, contributed to their conviction. Subsequently, that same therapist drew disciplinary sanctions from the California licensing board because of that confidentiality violation.

Consider the following actual cases. Hunt, Susan J.

June 05, 2006

Forward, a clinical social worker who had held two sessions with Ms. Simpson inmade unsolicited disclosures regarding her deceased former client. Forward commented in public that Ms.

A discussion on legal and ethical implications of the debate

Simpson had allegedly reported experiencing abuse at the hands of O. Mendoza, who represented the board, commented, "Therapy is based on privacy and secrecy, and a breach of confidentiality destroys the therapeutic relationship" Associated Press, Mendoza also noted that Ms. Forward had falsely represented herself as a psychologist in television interviews.

Forward later asserted that she had not violated patient confidentiality because the patient was dead, but had agreed not to appeal the board's decision in order to avoid a costly legal fight. At the time, Mr. He had also been a law partner and personal acquaintance of Hillary Clinton.

Foster had struggled with depression and had a prescription for Trazodone, authorized by his physician over the telephone just a few days earlier. His body was found with a gun in one hand, and gunshot residue on that hand.

An autopsy determined that he died as the result of a shot in the mouth.

A discussion on legal and ethical implications of the debate

A draft of a resignation letter, torn into 27 pieces, lay in his briefcase. Part of the note read, "I was not meant for the job or the spotlight of public life in Washington. Here ruining people is considered sport" Apple, Fiske and Kenneth Starr, his death was ruled a suicide.

Shortly before his death, Mr. Foster had met with James Hamilton, his personal attorney. The case quickly reached the Supreme Court, which deemed communications between a client and a lawyer protected by attorney-client privilege even after the client's death by a 6 to 3 vote.

Orne had tape recorded the sessions so that Sexton, who had a history of alcohol abuse and memory problems, could listen to them as she wished.

Orne had not destroyed the tapes and Ms. Middlebrook sought access to them to assist in her writing. Orne released the tapes as requested. Unlike the Simpson and Foster cases, the Sexton case involved release of the audio records approved by a family member with full legal authority to grant permission.Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS/E) is a topic of intense debate in society, not least among critical care medicine specialists, who treat many patients at or near the end of life.

Core ethical issues involved in PAS/E will be discussed and debated in a unique panel discussion at the. The Personal Genetics Education Project raises awareness and sparks conversation about the potential benefits as well as the ethical, legal, and social implications of personal genetics.

Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS/E) is a topic of intense debate in society, not least among critical care medicine specialists, who treat many patients at or near the end of life. Core ethical issues involved in PAS/E will be discussed and debated in a unique panel discussion at the. The abortion debate is the ongoing controversy surrounding the moral, legal, and religious status of induced abortion. The sides involved in the debate are the self-described “pro-choice” and “pro-life” movements. “Pro-choice” emphasizes the right of women to decide whether to terminate a pregnancy. This paper presents over 30 significant ethical issues that remain unresolved and invite more discussion by the general public. Social policy regarding these issues shouldn't be decided by special interest groups and lobbyists.

We strive to be inclusive of all voices in these discussions, regardless of socioeconomic or educational background, cultural or religious affiliation, and ethnic or personal identity. This handbook explores the different roles of ethics and compliance practitioners in promoting ethical conduct in organisations, and analyses benefits and drawbacks of the two approaches to understand whether it is more effective for organisations to have two separate functions dealing with ethics and compliance respectively.

Responsibility. We evaluate people and groups as responsible or not, depending on how seriously they take their responsibilities. Often we do this informally, via moral judgment. ABOUT LEGALTECH. Legaltech is the largest and most important legal technology event of the year.

Legaltech® provides an in-depth look at what the technological world has in store for you and your practice AND offers an expansive exhibit floor with the most extensive gathering of innovative products designed to meet your current and future technology needs.

Check out the online debate Sweatshops are ethical. DEBATES. OPINIONS. FORUMS. POLLS. out doubt by telling us that, for purposes of this debate, only mutually compliant "sweatshops" are to be the topic of discussion, Pro gets my vote. Con also had links to scholarly articles pertaining to various ethical issues such as business .

The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence | Law Homepage | Above the Law